Skip to main content

If we should

Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AI-generated text isn’t free speech - yet

I read the Judge’s Order , so you don’t have to. Another 49 pages were added to the heart-wrenching tragedy of Sewell Garcia in May, as Judge Conway ruled against Character A.I. and Google on a number of motions argued in the case brought against them by Sewell’s mother. Sewell's tragic fate, seemingly encouraged by an AI agent in the final, crucial moment, drove Megan Garcia to sue Character A.I. and it's sponsor, Google, on a wide range of grounds. The defendants' defences included the claim that AI is free speech. Of the judge's rulings, 3 are profound in their impact on AI ethics. Google knows that AI has the potential to harm. When the Google team who later formed Character A.I. asked to release a version of their LLM designed for text dialogues (LaMDA), Google denied their request.  Notably because: “ Google employees raised concerns that users might 'ascribe too much meaning to the text [output by LLMs]', because ‘humans are prepared to interpret strings...
Post a Comment
Read more

The callousing of our callow youth

At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell delivered a ray of hope. Losing an argument to a 12 year old is sort of on-brand for Mike, given his non-consensual relationship with reality and enthusiastic disregard for personal credibility. Mike mainlines social media election misinformation like Neo learns kungfu and he was caught on camera aggressively shouting a transcript of his twitter feed into the face of a child . * That social media actively floods our modern attention, discourse and culture with the most antagonistic, inflammatory and misleading content is, of course, widely known. As Stephen Fry recent put it , Facebook and Twitter … “are the worst polluters in human history.  Worse than any chemical plant ever.  You and your children cannot breathe the air or swim in the waters of our culture without breathing in the toxic particulates and stinking effluvia that belch and pour unchecked from their companies into the currents of our world” * ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trading factchecks for fat cheques

Spinach is full of iron.  We only use 10% of our brain power.  Man never landed on the moon.  Vaccines cause autism.  They’re eating the cats. You have an influencer friend, Fred.  He tells you that he has discovered that he can reach more people and make more money if he just stops checking whether things are true before he shares them with his audience.  What would you think of Fred? Is it morally wrong if he doesn’t create the misinformation himself, but just passes it along to those who have chosen to listen to him?  Haven’t we all been guilty of repeating common misconceptions at some point?  Can we hold one person morally accountable for repeating reports of pet consumption in Springfield, but give another a pass for inflicting spinach on their children at every meal? As Gina Rushton reports , Meta has now taken a position on this ethical dilemma.  Where in 2021 it celebrated “industry leading” fact-checking, it recently announced the ...
Post a Comment
Read more