Skip to main content

Posts

The callousing of our callow youth

At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell delivered a ray of hope. Losing an argument to a 12 year old is sort of on-brand for Mike, given his non-consensual relationship with reality and enthusiastic disregard for personal credibility. Mike mainlines social media election misinformation like Neo learns kungfu and he was caught on camera aggressively ejecting his latest meme-load into the face of a child . * That social media actively floods our modern attention, discourse and culture with the most antagonistic, inflamatory and misleading content is, of course, widely known. As Stephen Fry recent put it , Facebook and Twitter … “are the worst polluters in human history.  Worse than any chemical plant ever.  You and your children cannot breathe the air or swim in the waters of our culture without breathing in the toxic particulates and stinking effluvia that belch and pour unchecked from their companies into the currents of our world” * While channeling this
Recent posts

Digital Derangement

Last week, Stephen Fry called Zuckerberg and Musk the "worst polluters in human history", but he wasn't talking about the environment. The self-professed technophile, who once so joyfully quarried the glittering bounty of social media, has turned canary, warning directly and urgently of the stench he now detects in the bowels of Earth's digital coal mine: A reek of digital effluvia in the "air and waters" of our global culture. The long arc of Fry's journey from advocate to alarmist is important.  The flash-bang of today's "AI ethics" panic has distracted our moral attention from the duller truth that malignant "ethical misalignment" has already metastascised into every major organ of our digital lives. * In 2015, Google's corporate restructure quietly replaced the famous "Don't be evil" motto with a saccharine, MBA-approved fascimile.  It seems the motto was becoming a millstone, as it allowed critics to attack

Systems are very bad people

In April this year, ASIC commenced action against Macquarie Bank for failing to “monitor, detect and prevent unauthorised transactions”.  These charges relate to actions of convicted fraudster Ross Hopkins, but crucially, ASIC specified their action was “not focused on Mr Hopkins’ conduct”. Where compliance is achieved through a combination of system functionality and user action - and the focus is not the conduct of the user - where does the moral accountability lie for financial fraud? * The practical reality is that users often rely on system functionality to "monitor, detect and prevent" actions which are “not permitted”.   Greyed-out menu items or modal warnings indicate, by convention, which operations are "permitted". But there are two types of authority at play here - one of the system, the other of the user. The first is an authority as in "your access level in the system means you could click this button" and the second is an authority as in &qu

If we should

Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.